From Shubhi K | Product & Market Analysis
Nvidia's Receivables, Inventory and a $279B Supply Bill Before Q3 Earnings
On this page
Nvidia's quarterly revenue grew 2.7 times in eight quarters. Its supply commitments grew 9.7 times over the same window, to $279 billion at 26 July 2026. Nvidia accounts receivable and inventory sit in between, at 3.6 and 4.1 times. Only one of those three lines has clearly broken away from revenue, and it is not the receivables line the market argued about in August.
Key takeaways
- Nvidia's supply commitments now equal 2.9 times one quarter of revenue. They were $28.9 billion against $35.1 billion of quarterly revenue in October 2024, and $279 billion against $96.2 billion in July 2026.
- Receivables jumped to 60 days sales outstanding in one quarter. Nvidia's DSO sat between 45 and 54 days for seven straight quarters, then rose to 60 days after the company extended payment terms to certain investment-grade customers.
- Inventory days stepped up in 2025 and then went flat. On Nvidia's own method, inventory days rose from 78 in October 2024 to about 119 a year later, and have stayed between 114 and 119 since.
- Almost all of the new commitment money falls in fiscal 2028 and 2029. Between April and July 2026 the amount due beyond fiscal 2027 rose from $24 billion to $187 billion, primarily for memory.
Short answer
Yes, but unevenly. Over eight quarters Nvidia's revenue rose 174%, receivables 256%, inventory 313% and supply commitments 865%. Receivables only broke their range in the latest quarter, and inventory days have been flat for a year. The commitment line is the real stretch: $279 billion, mostly memory, mostly due in fiscal 2028 and 2029.
Nvidia's balance sheet in three ratios, eight quarters
This post reads three lines from Nvidia's filings across the eight quarters ending 26 July 2026. The window starts with the quarter ended 27 October 2024, which was the third quarter of fiscal 2025. Nvidia's fiscal year ends in late January, so its fiscal 2027 is mostly calendar 2026.
The first ratio is days sales outstanding, or DSO. It measures how many days of revenue are sitting in accounts receivable, meaning sales booked but not yet paid for. Nvidia publishes this number in its quarterly CFO commentary. Its printed figures match receivables divided by quarterly revenue, multiplied by 91 days, so the same formula fills the one quarter it did not print.
The second is inventory days, sometimes called days sales of inventory. It measures how many days of cost of revenue are sitting in the warehouse, in work in process or in raw materials. Nvidia last printed it in October 2024, at 78 days. Inventory divided by quarterly cost of revenue, times 91, reproduces that 78 exactly, so this post applies the same method forward.
The third is not a ratio Nvidia reports at all. It is supply commitments, the money Nvidia has promised to suppliers for components and manufacturing capacity, compared against one quarter of revenue. A commitment is not yet a liability on the balance sheet. It is an obligation the company expects to turn into inventory and then cost of revenue.
| Quarter end | Revenue | Receivables | DSO | Inventory | Inventory days | Supply commitments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2024 (Q3 FY25) | 35.1 | 17.7 | 46 | 7.7 | 78 | 28.9 |
| Jan 2025 (Q4 FY25) | 39.3 | 23.1 | 53* | 10.1 | 87* | 30.8 |
| Apr 2025 (Q1 FY26) | 44.1 | 22.1 | 46 | 11.3 | 80* (59 as reported) | 29.8 |
| Jul 2025 (Q2 FY26) | 46.7 | 27.8 | 54 | 15.0 | 106* | Not on same basis |
| Oct 2025 (Q3 FY26) | 57.0 | 33.4 | 53 | 19.8 | 119* | 50.3 |
| Jan 2026 (Q4 FY26) | 68.1 | 38.5 | 51 | 21.4 | 114* | 95.2 |
| Apr 2026 (Q1 FY27) | 81.6 | 40.7 | 45 | 25.8 | 115* | 119.0 |
| Jul 2026 (Q2 FY27) | 96.2 | 63.1 | 60 | 31.6 | 119* | 279 |
Revenue, receivables, inventory and cost of revenue come from Nvidia's 10-Q filings and the 8-K earnings releases. DSO without an asterisk is Nvidia's own printed figure. Figures marked * are Zan Digital calculations using the formulas above. The April 2025 inventory days figure excludes the $4.5 billion H20 charge from cost of revenue, because that one-off charge would otherwise make inventory look leaner than it was. In July 2025 Nvidia reported a broader $45.8 billion "total purchase commitments" figure that included cloud service agreements, so no like-for-like supply number exists for that quarter.
Nvidia accounts receivable: 60 days after seven quarters in a range
For seven quarters, Nvidia's DSO moved inside a narrow band between 45 and 54 days. It rose when a product ramped late in a quarter and fell when customers paid early. Then, in the quarter ended 26 July 2026, receivables reached $63.1 billion, against $38.5 billion at the January year-end, and DSO hit 60 days.
The sequential numbers make the break clearer. Revenue rose 18% from the April quarter to the July quarter. Receivables rose 55%. A 15-day jump in one quarter is large for a company whose collections had been this stable.
Nvidia's explanation was direct. The CFO commentary attributed the increase to "extended payment terms on large, multi-quarter agreements with certain investment-grade customers". The receivables jump is a policy choice, not a collections failure, and that distinction matters for how you read it.
What changed in the payment terms
The 10-Q gives the policy in more detail than the commentary. Nvidia says payment is "generally due shortly after delivery". It then adds that for investment-grade customer purchases it has provided, and may provide, "longer payment terms ranging from 90 days up to one year" to help with large data centre builds.
A one-year payment term on a hardware sale is a form of customer financing. The customer receives the systems now and pays from a later budget. Nvidia carries the working capital in the meantime, which is exactly why the receivables line grew faster than revenue.
The filing does not say how much of the $63.1 billion carries the longer terms. That is the single most useful number missing from the disclosure. My view is that it should be the first question on the Q3 call, ahead of any guidance question.
Who owes the money
Concentration rose at the same time. At 26 July 2026, five direct customers accounted for 70% of the receivables balance, against three customers holding 56% at the January year-end. The customer side of that picture is covered in the breakdown of which buyers carry Nvidia's Q3 guide.
The phrase "investment-grade" carries a lot of weight here. It limits the credit risk Nvidia is taking. It does not limit the timing risk. A creditworthy customer that pays in 360 days still leaves the cash off Nvidia's books for 360 days.
Nvidia inventory days rose from 78 to 119, then stopped
Inventory is the line most people expected to blow out, and it is the one that has behaved most steadily lately. Inventory grew from $7.7 billion in October 2024 to $31.6 billion in July 2026. That is 4.1 times, against 2.7 times for revenue.
The timing matters more than the total. Almost all of the rise in inventory days happened between January and October 2025, when the computed figure went from about 87 to about 119. Since then it has sat between 114 and 119 for four quarters. Inventory and cost of revenue have grown together for a year.
Nvidia's own explanation for the latest quarter is a product transition. The CFO commentary tied the rise to preparation for Vera Rubin in the third quarter. Building stock ahead of a launch is normal, and the composition of the inventory supports that reading.
Raw materials tripled in six months
Between 25 January and 26 July 2026, raw materials rose from $3.8 billion to $11.3 billion. Work in process rose from $8.8 billion to $13.4 billion. Finished goods actually fell, from $8.8 billion to $6.9 billion.
That shape is the opposite of a demand problem. A company struggling to sell product accumulates finished goods. Nvidia is accumulating components and partly built systems, which is what a manufacturer does before a ramp. It also fits the commitment data below, where memory is the main thing being bought.
A second check is write-downs. If inventory were going stale, provisions would be climbing. They are not. Nvidia recognised inventory provisions of $1.6 billion in the first half of fiscal 2027, half the $3.2 billion of a year earlier.
Charges for excess purchase obligations tell the same story. They were $501 million in the first half of fiscal 2027, against $3.1 billion in the first half of fiscal 2026. The prior year included the $4.5 billion H20 charge, when export rules stranded a China product. Nothing on that scale has appeared since.
Supply commitments grew 9.7 times while revenue grew 2.7 times
This is where the balance sheet, or more precisely the space just off it, has broken from revenue. Nvidia reported $28.9 billion of supply and capacity obligations in October 2024. The figure barely moved for the next two reported quarters, at $30.8 billion and $29.8 billion.
Then it accelerated. It reached $50.3 billion in October 2025 and $95.2 billion at the January 2026 year-end. It was $119 billion in April 2026 and $279 billion in July 2026. The last step alone added $160 billion in a single quarter.
The company was plain about what the money buys. Its Q2 commentary said commitments rose from $119 billion to $279 billion, "primarily related to the procurement of memory". That ties Nvidia's balance sheet directly to the memory shortage and the question of who pays its premium.
Where the $279 billion lands by year
The schedule in the 10-Q is the most revealing table in the filing. Of the $279 billion, $92 billion falls in the rest of fiscal 2027, $87 billion in fiscal 2028 and $88 billion in fiscal 2029. Only $12 billion falls after that.
Now compare it with one quarter earlier. In April 2026 the 10-Q said $95 billion of the $119 billion would be paid in the rest of fiscal 2027, leaving $24 billion for fiscal 2028 to 2031. By July, the amount due beyond fiscal 2027 was $187 billion. The near-term bill barely moved. The entire increase landed two and three years out.
That is a different kind of bet from the one Nvidia made in 2024. Then, commitments covered the next few quarters of Blackwell. Now, Nvidia is locking in supply for products it will sell in calendar 2027 and 2028, at prices set during a shortage.
Prepaid supply shrank as commitments grew
Some suppliers get paid in advance. In October 2024 Nvidia reported $5.2 billion of supply and capacity prepayments, equal to 18% of its supply commitments. By October 2025 the prepaid balance in the 10-Q notes was about $3.5 billion against $50.3 billion of commitments, closer to 7%.
In the filings read for this post, the prepaid line was not broken out separately after October 2025. The direction before that is still informative. Nvidia has been committing far more while prepaying less of it, which fits a buyer with strong bargaining power rather than one paying up to secure scarce supply.
Is Nvidia's balance sheet stretching faster than revenue?
Take the two working capital lines together. Receivables plus inventory equalled 72% of a quarter's revenue in October 2024, and 98% in July 2026. That is real stretch, and most of it arrived in two steps: the 2025 inventory build and the 2026 receivables jump.
Year on year, the picture is milder. Against July 2025, revenue rose 106%, receivables 127% and inventory 111%. Over twelve months, working capital grew only a little faster than sales.
The commitment line is in a different league. Supply commitments were 0.82 times quarterly revenue in October 2024. They were 1.40 times at January 2026 and 2.90 times in July 2026. Against trailing twelve-month revenue of about $303 billion, the $279 billion of commitments is 92% of a full year of sales.
The cash flow cost
Stretch shows up in cash before it shows up anywhere else. In the first half of fiscal 2027, the receivables build absorbed $24.6 billion of operating cash and inventory another $10.2 billion. Operating cash flow for the half was still $74.4 billion.
The quarter on its own was sharper. Operating cash flow was $24.1 billion in Q2, down from $50.3 billion in Q1, on revenue that grew 18%. Nvidia attributed the drop to working capital and cash taxes. Profit rose, and the cash it produced halved.
I would not call this a warning yet. Nvidia's gross margin in the quarter was 75%, and the cash is owed by large, rated companies. I would call it a change in business model. Nvidia now finances part of its customers' builds and pre-commits to supply for years ahead, which makes it look more like an industrial supplier than the asset-light chip designer of 2023. The same pattern in earlier cycles is traced in the comparison with Lucent and Nortel vendor financing.
Where this argument is weakest
Three objections deserve a straight hearing, and two of them substantially weaken the case for alarm.
Revenue is about to step up again
Every ratio here divides by the latest quarter's revenue. Nvidia guided Q3 fiscal 2027 revenue to about $108 billion. If that lands, DSO and inventory days fall mechanically, even if no customer pays faster. A balance sheet built ahead of growth always looks stretched in the quarter before the growth arrives.
The same applies to commitments. If you believe revenue in fiscal 2028 and 2029 runs well above today's rate, $87 billion a year of supply purchases is ordinary. The ratio only alarms you if you doubt the revenue. That makes this a forecast question, not an accounting one.
Investment-grade terms are not weak credit
Extended terms to rated buyers are not the same as lending to a startup. Nvidia restricts the longer terms to investment-grade customers in its own disclosure. The risk is delayed cash, not lost cash, unless a rated hyperscaler stops paying, which has no precedent in this cycle.
The counterpoint I cannot fully dismiss is concentration. Five customers holding 70% of receivables means a dispute or a renegotiation with one of them moves the whole line. That is a risk of size, not of credit quality, and the filing does not let you size it.
The commitment numbers are not perfectly comparable
Nvidia changed the wording of its commitment disclosure several times across these eight quarters. It moved from "purchase commitments and obligations for inventory and manufacturing capacity" to "total purchase commitments" to "supply-related commitments" to a fiscal-year table of "supply and capacity". The July 2025 figure could not be matched at all. The trend is unmistakable, but the precise multiple of 9.7 times should be read as directional, not audited.
What to check in the Q3 fiscal 2027 report
Third-party trackers expect results in mid to late November. Nvidia had not confirmed a date in the sources checked on 26 October 2026. When the 10-Q lands, read these five lines in this order.
| Line | July 2026 value | A reassuring reading | A worrying reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| DSO | 60 days | Back toward 50 days as $108B of revenue lands | Above 60 days, meaning longer terms are spreading |
| Receivables concentration | Five customers, 70% | Fewer customers above 10% | One customer above 25% |
| Inventory days | About 119 | Flat or down after the Rubin launch | Up, with finished goods rising |
| Supply commitments | $279B | Growth slows and the fiscal 2027 tranche converts to inventory | Another step change, with the tail pushed further out |
| Excess purchase obligation charges | $201M in Q2 | Stays in the low hundreds of millions | A jump, which means some commitments already look too large |
The last row is the early warning. Commitments only become a problem when demand falls short of them, and the first place that shows is a charge for excess purchase obligations. Nvidia took exactly that charge on H20 in 2025. A similar charge on memory would be the signal that the 2028 bet is too big, and it is one of the indicators worth adding to the list of AI chip selloff indicators.
The other place to look is the investments note. Nvidia is also an investor in several of its customers, which complicates the reading of who owes it money. The filing trail on that is in the trace of Nvidia's OpenAI investment through its filings, and the audit questions it raises are in the auditor tests for circular financing revenue.
Frequently asked questions
What is Nvidia's days sales outstanding?
Nvidia reported 60 days sales outstanding for the quarter ended 26 July 2026, up from 45 days in the April quarter. Receivables were $63.1 billion on quarterly revenue of $96.2 billion. Over the previous seven quarters, Nvidia's DSO stayed between 45 and 54 days. The company attributed the latest increase to extended payment terms on large, multi-quarter agreements with certain investment-grade customers.
Why did Nvidia's accounts receivable increase in 2026?
Nvidia's receivables rose from $38.5 billion in January 2026 to $63.1 billion in July 2026. Revenue growth explains part of it. The rest comes from longer payment terms: Nvidia's 10-Q says it has provided terms from 90 days up to one year to some investment-grade customers building large data centres. Five direct customers held 70% of the receivables balance at July 2026.
How much inventory does Nvidia have?
Nvidia held $31.6 billion of inventory at 26 July 2026, up from $21.4 billion at the January year-end. Raw materials were $11.3 billion, work in process $13.4 billion and finished goods $6.9 billion. Nvidia linked the increase to preparation for Vera Rubin. Inventory provisions in the first half of fiscal 2027 were $1.6 billion, half the level of a year earlier.
What are Nvidia's supply commitments?
Supply commitments are amounts Nvidia has agreed to pay suppliers for components and manufacturing capacity. They reached $279 billion at 26 July 2026, up from $119 billion one quarter earlier, primarily for memory. Of the total, $92 billion is due in the rest of fiscal 2027, $87 billion in fiscal 2028 and $88 billion in fiscal 2029. They are not yet liabilities on the balance sheet.
Is Nvidia's balance sheet a warning sign before earnings?
Not on receivables or inventory alone. DSO rose to 60 days for a stated reason, and inventory days have been flat for a year. The larger question is supply commitments, which now equal 2.9 times quarterly revenue and fall mostly in fiscal 2028 and 2029. They are only a problem if demand falls short, and the first sign would be rising charges for excess purchase obligations.
How do you calculate Nvidia's DSO and inventory days?
Divide period-end accounts receivable by that quarter's revenue and multiply by 91 days. That reproduces every DSO figure Nvidia printed in this period. For inventory days, divide period-end inventory by that quarter's cost of revenue and multiply by 91. That reproduces the 78 days Nvidia reported in October 2024. Remove one-off charges such as the H20 write-down from cost of revenue first.
Where to start
If you hold Nvidia, or run a business priced off its supply chain, build one small sheet this week. Put the eight rows of the table above into it and add a ninth when the Q3 10-Q arrives. Three columns matter: DSO, the excess purchase obligation charge, and the fiscal 2028 commitment tranche.
Then decide in advance what would change your mind. Mine is simple. A DSO above 60 days alongside a rising excess-obligation charge would move me from "business model change" to "demand risk". Writing the threshold down before the report stops the report from writing it for you. For how the same commitments run through earnings on the depreciation side, read the analysis of GPU depreciation and AI earnings.
Last verified 26 October 2026 against Nvidia filings through the 10-Q for the quarter ended 26 July 2026. Refresh after the Q3 fiscal 2027 10-Q.
Read with this
The customer side of the same quarter is in who is carrying Nvidia's $108B Q3 guide. The supply side runs through who pays the DRAM shortage premium.
References
- Nvidia Corporation, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended 26 July 2026, filed August 2026. Used for balance sheet, cash flow, inventory composition, provisions, payment terms, receivables concentration and the commitment schedule.
- Nvidia Corporation, CFO commentary, second quarter fiscal 2027, 26 August 2026. Used for DSO of 60 days, the payment terms explanation, the Vera Rubin inventory comment and the memory attribution.
- Nvidia Corporation, CFO commentary, first quarter fiscal 2027, May 2026. Used for DSO of 45 days, $119B of commitments and the H20 charge.
- Nvidia Corporation, CFO commentary, fourth quarter fiscal 2026, 25 February 2026. Used for DSO of 51 days and $95.2B of supply-related commitments.
- Nvidia Corporation, CFO commentary, third quarter fiscal 2026, 19 November 2025. Used for DSO of 53 days and $50.3B of commitments.
- Nvidia Corporation, CFO commentary, second quarter fiscal 2026, 27 August 2025. Used for DSO of 54 days and the $45.8B total purchase commitments figure.
- Nvidia Corporation, CFO commentary, third quarter fiscal 2025, 20 November 2024. Used for DSO of 46 days, DSI of 78 days, $28.9B of commitments and $5.2B of prepayments.
- Nvidia Corporation, Form 10-Q and 10-K filings, October 2024 to April 2026, via SEC EDGAR. Used for quarterly revenue, cost of revenue, receivables, inventory, prepaid supply balances, and the $30.8B and $95.2B year-end obligations stated in the 10-K audit reports.
Weakest point of the source base: every figure is Nvidia's own disclosure, and the commitment line changed definition several times across the window. Inventory days and the Q4 fiscal 2025 DSO are Zan Digital calculations, not company-reported figures.
Related reading